Monthly Archives: April 2012

Don’t discuss papers you get to review with your lab group!

One of the things about disagreement, particularly in the Midwest, I think, is that it comes as much from what is not said as from what is said. In this case, I think the consensus is that it is NOT … Continue reading

Posted in Publishing your work | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Agreement and disagreement in social evolution: insight from David Queller

There was a lot of attention given to an erroneous argument against Hamilton’s theory of inclusive fitness, the role of haplodiploidy, and the evolution of eusociality a couple of years ago. In a recent blog, Masatoshi Nei has resurrected it, … Continue reading

Posted in sociobiology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Can you discuss a paper you got to review with your lab group?

Recently I got a very interesting paper to review. I reviewed it promptly, sent in a very positive review, then realized it would be fun to discuss with our lab group. I labeled it “confidential,” then sent it around for … Continue reading

Posted in Publishing your work | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Xenophobia – can we get rid of it? Can we understand it in Arizona?

What kind of meeting do you like best, the kind where everyone has the same background you do, or the kind where there are people of different backgrounds? If the meeting is too large, there will be a natural tendency … Continue reading

Posted in Scientific meetings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment