Category Archives: Publishing your work

Don’t discuss papers you get to review with your lab group!

One of the things about disagreement, particularly in the Midwest, I think, is that it comes as much from what is not said as from what is said. In this case, I think the consensus is that it is NOT … Continue reading

Posted in Publishing your work | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Can you discuss a paper you got to review with your lab group?

Recently I got a very interesting paper to review. I reviewed it promptly, sent in a very positive review, then realized it would be fun to discuss with our lab group. I labeled it “confidential,” then sent it around for … Continue reading

Posted in Publishing your work | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The scandal of the Research Works Act and for-huge-profit publishers like Elsevier

Review can be broken down into two general categories, first, the work done by professionals that evaluate papers, along with the editors who choose who evaluates, then make the final decision, and, second, the entities that choose the editors and provide the software for the reviewing process. The first category is generally performed by academic professionals who do not get extra pay for editorial and reviewing work, so we can say it is paid for by their universities and their research grants, whoever is paying their salaries. Continue reading

Posted in Publishing your work, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment