Long had I heard that in mathematics sharing and crediting of new ideas happened outside of the normal publishing routes, recently through online channels prior to review. Even journals like Science and Nature tolerate this kind of posting. As others have pointed out, posting at places like arXiv should not increase your chance of getting scooped, but decrease it. According to Jabberwocky, journals in ecology have been behind the times, but are beginning to understand the value of this kind of sharing. The way we exchange information is changing fast, often for the better. The faster we can find out about what others are doing in our field, the better. Though I am not sure what this does for highly competitive fields like cancer biology.
I would love to hear from people who have had experience with posting in arXiv or similar places. Do people comment? Do you get to improve your science? Get credit for priority before publishing? Is it worth it?
- Ensuring arXiv’s Future (bluesyemre.com)
- arXiv (wulibraries.typepad.com)
- Simons Foundation Gives arXiv Multi-Year Operating Grant (digital-scholarship.org)
- ArXiv Attracts Biologists (the-scientist.com)
- Cornell University Library Receives Grant From Simons Foundation to Help Support arXiv Repository (infodocket.com)
- Biology discovers arXiv (sort of) (blogs.discovermagazine.com)